The cost

Every bill starts with the same cow: one who can't eat enough.

Negative energy balance is the catalyst. When she drops her feed in the weeks after calving, the costs follow as a cascade. This page prices what can be priced, per 1,000 cows a year, names what can't, and shows every calculation.

Film 3 of 7What the Gap Takes4:18

Recorded on working US dairies, 2014–2017. Captions cover the narration and the founder on camera.

The cascade

She drops her feed, and the cascade begins.

It is not one cost. Each problem in the fresh pen raises the odds of the next, and the bills land across the whole lactation, and beyond it.

Before the diagnosis

2–4 weeks

Milk yield starts to fall before ketosis is diagnosed

Rajala-Schultz et al. 1999 · Finland

Over the lactation

251 kg

305-day milk loss per case of subclinical ketosis

Raboisson et al. 2014 · France

UK herd life

28%

average UK culling rate, with cows leaving after 3.6 lactations

NMR 2023, via Macmillan 2024 · UK

Replacing her

£1,819

to rear a heifer to calving, taking 1.5 lactations to repay

Boulton et al. 2017 · UK

She pays twice

Condition she spends now is bought back later, at a premium.

Losing half a condition score in the first 60 days after calving is typical. What she takes off her own back in the fresh pen has to go back on later in the lactation, from feed, and putting it back takes more feed energy than the score held.

385 Mcal × 4.184 MJ/Mcal = 1,611 MJ · 520 Mcal × 4.184 = 2,176 MJ · 520 ÷ 385 = 1.35 → 35% more
NASEM 2021 · USA (one condition score, 650 kg cow)

Condition and fertility

+42.8%

higher pregnancy rate for each additional unit of body condition score at calving

The same meta-analysis found +16.8% per unit at the lowest point (nadir).

Bédère et al. 2018 · France

Two Holstein cows with yellow ear tags looking towards the camera in a dairy yard
Fresh cows in the yard · Film 6, 5:00 · US dairy, 2014–2017

The six bills · per 1,000 cows per year

Four bills priced. Two counted in their own units.

Every pound figure below is a DMI Impact calculation from cited inputs, written out in full. Lost milk leads, and it never arrives as an invoice: it is milk she never made.

01Lost milk£302,5051,000 cows × 8,643 L × 10% × £0.35/L = £302,505 · at 16% = £484,008 (at the revised exact July price £0.3547/L: £306,567 and £490,507). Average UK lactation: Defra 2026 · UK. +10% to +16%: DMI Impact commercial dairies, not peer-reviewed.
02Body condition£21,6141,000 cows × 0.5 of a score (typical loss in the first 60 days) × 135 Mcal (520 Mcal ME to regain a score − 385 Mcal the score held) = 67,500 Mcal ME = the energy in 63,606 kg of milk (520 Mcal ME = 343 Mcal NEL = 490 kg of 3.5%-fat milk) ÷ 1.03 kg/L × £0.35/L = £21,614. NASEM 2021 · USA, p.34. 1.03 kg/L: DMI Impact assumption.
03Disease£8,253Treatment only. Ketosis: 117 cases (11.7%, Macrae 2019 · UK) × €28.50 × £0.85/€ = £2,834. Metritis: 69 cases (6.9%, USDA NAHMS 2018 · USA) × $99.41 × £0.79/$ = £5,419. £2,834 + £5,419 = £8,253. Costs per case: Steeneveld 2020 · Netherlands (€28.50 = 19% of €150, p.9), Liang 2013 · USA. Exchange rates: DMI Impact assumptions.
04Fertility16–22 dayslonger from calving to conception, per cow with subclinical ketosis. Raboisson 2014 · FranceNot priced
05Emissions+2.3%CO2e per tonne of milk, per case of subclinical ketosis. Mostert 2018 · NetherlandsNot priced
06Early culling£7,1251,000 cows × 1% extra culls (DMI Impact assumption) × £712.50 net replacement cost = £7,125. Farmers Weekly 2024 · UK

Total exposure

£339,497

per 1,000 cows per year

Up to £521,000 at the measured ceiling. £302,505 + £21,614 + £8,253 + £7,125 = £339,497 · with lost milk at the 16% ceiling: £484,008 + £36,992 = £521,000.

Per 1,000 cows per year · milk at £0.35/L (Defra · UK, July 2026: the lowest published month of Q3) · DMI Impact calculation, assumptions stated

A percentage increase is anecdotal until scientific studies verify the correlation and the causation.

What the total leaves out

The total is a floor, not the whole bill.

Three costs sit outside the sum: problems that compound, fertility counted in days, and emissions counted per litre.

Compounding

Several problems in one cow cost more than the same problems apart

The total above prices each bill on its own, so it leaves this out.

Wöckel et al. 2026 · Germany

Fertility

Counted in days, not pounds

Calving to first service was 8 days longer, and calving to conception 16 to 22 days longer, in cows with subclinical ketosis.

Raboisson et al. 2014 · France

Research note · emissions per litre

Health and emissions intensity move together

Each case of subclinical ketosis adds 2.3% to the CO2e per tonne of milk. And every lactation a cow completes spreads the emissions of her rearing over more litres: cows with five to eight lactations could have up to 40% lower emission intensity than cows that leave after their first.

Mostert 2018 · Netherlands · von Soosten et al. 2020 · Germany

The evidence behind this page · 15 sources

Every figure on this page traces to a named source we hold in full. Pound figures are DMI Impact calculations from those sources, written out beside each bill. The +10% and +16% are DMI Impact commercial observation, not peer-reviewed.

  1. Defra (2026) Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2025 (average lactation 8,643 L) · UK · gov.uk
  2. Defra (2026) United Kingdom milk prices and composition of milk, notice for August 2026 (July 2026: 35 ppl) · UK · gov.uk
  3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 8th revised edition, p.34 · USA · nationalacademies.org
  4. Macrae AI et al. (2019) Prevalence of excessive negative energy balance in commercial United Kingdom dairy herds · UK
  5. USDA APHIS NAHMS (2018) Dairy 2014, Report 3: Health and Management Practices on U.S. Dairy Operations · USA · aphis.usda.gov
  6. Steeneveld W et al. (2020) Estimating the combined costs of clinical and subclinical ketosis in dairy cows. PLoS ONE · Netherlands · doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230448
  7. Liang D (2013) Estimating the economic losses from diseases and extended days open with a farm-level stochastic model. MSc thesis · USA
  8. Raboisson D, Mounié M, Maigné E (2014) Diseases, reproductive performance, and changes in milk production associated with subclinical ketosis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci · France · doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8237
  9. Mostert PF (2018) The impact of diseases in dairy cows on greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance · Netherlands · doi.org/10.18174/445487
  10. Macmillan S (2024) Advice on calculating cull cow costs accurately. Farmers Weekly (cites NMR 2023) · UK · fwi.co.uk
  11. Wöckel A et al. (2026) Economics of production diseases at the individual animal level in German dairy farms. Dairy · Germany · doi.org/10.3390/dairy7020026
  12. Rajala-Schultz PJ, Gröhn YT, McCulloch CE (1999) Effects of milk fever, ketosis, and lameness on milk yield in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci · Finland · doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75235-5
  13. Boulton AC, Rushton J, Wathes DC (2017) An empirical analysis of the cost of rearing dairy heifers from birth to first calving. Animal · UK · doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000064
  14. Bédère N et al. (2018) Meta-analysis of the relationships between reproduction, milk yield and body condition score in dairy cows. Livestock Science · France · doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.01.017
  15. von Soosten D, Meyer U, Flachowsky G, Dänicke S (2020) Dairy cow health and greenhouse gas emission intensity. Dairy · Germany · doi.org/10.3390/dairy1010003

Next · Film 4 · The Solution

What can you do about it, without changing your ration, your buildings or your genetics?

The Solution →
Film 4 · Back to the Feed Barrier9:48